Cornwell v. Microsoft Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
*232 ¶ 1 Dawn Cornwell asks us to reverse the grant of summary judgment in her retaliation claim against her former employer, Microsoft Corporation. At issue is whether she presented enough evidence to show that her supervisors had sufficient knowledge that she had taken a protected action under the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD), RCW 49.60.030. Without establishing this knowledge, Cornwell cannot demonstrate a potential causal link between the adverse employment action taken against her and her protected activity. We hold that Cornwell presented sufficient evidence to survive…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Elizabeth Gordon v. New York City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. ArbogastWashington Supreme Court · 2022
- Abubacarr Waggeh, Pet/cross-resp v. State Of Wa Dept Of Corrections, Resp/cross-petsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Andrews v. Yakima School District No 7District Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- Angel Roberson v. SEIU Healthcare 1199NW, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Bakki v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.