Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Chaffin v. Excise Board of Okmulgee County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1935No. 24747PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs in the court below and, the defendant in error was the defendant in the court below. Plaintiffs in error will be referred to herein as plaintiffs and the defendant in error will be referred to herein as defendant.

Facts stated: The United States Department of Agriculture, through the A. & M, College and the board of county commissioners of Okmulgee county, entered into a contract by the terms of which Okmulgee county agreed to pay $5,879 on the salary and expenses of the county agent and home demonstration agent for Okmulgee county for the fiscal year of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. City of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Cotton v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Excise Board of Creek County v. State Ex Rel. KissickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Crawford v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. Porch v. HayesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API