Legal Opinion

Kierulff & Ravenscroft v. Koping

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1928No. Docket No. 3589PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiffs had judgment for the sum of $500, from which judgment the defendant appeals.

The action is founded upon a written guaranty in the words and figures following, to wit:

“Stockton, Calif., May 5, 1926.
“Kierulff & Ravenscroft,
“Dear Sirs,
“Following is a list of property owned by me described for the purpose of establishing my husbands credit with you who is the owner of the radio store known as the Stockton Radio Shoppe; 1 apartment house, value $31,000 at 437 E. Fremont St., Stockton (*4 interest); 1 22-acre ranch value $6500, six miles E. of Stockton on The Linden Road, (i/2 interest); 1…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lean v. GeaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. R. N. Nason & Co. v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Berg Metals Corp. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. In Re Imperial Credit Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Goldman v. DangerfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. Virden Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API