Legal Opinion

Blanco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 28, 2012No. 3D10-1290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, J.

Joaquin Blanco appeals from his conviction for trafficking in amphetamine, alleging several errors in his jury trial. Because we find that the errors complained of were waived or harmless, we affirm.

Blanco was arrested and charged with trafficking when he sold crystal methamphetamine to an undercover police officer. Blanco claimed he was induced into making the sale by Jesus Felizzula, a State confidential informant who Blanco met at an HIV facility. Prior to trial, the State moved to exclude any reference to Blanco’s HIV condition or the details of Felizzula’s agreement with the State. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Munoz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Little v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Lavado v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Lavin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blanco v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. BRIDGE FINANCIAL, INC. v. J. FISCHER & ASSOCIATES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  3. Blanco v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API