Legal Opinion

Worthy v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 18, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered February 2, 2004, denying the motion by defendants United Rehabilitation, Zuckerman and Tiretta for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, modified, on the law, to grant the motion and dismiss the complaint as against Zuckerman and Tiretta, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Sufficient facts presented in opposition established a question of fact as to whether the movants had constructive notice that a child under age seven resided in the apartment (see Juarez v Wavecrest…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Mendez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matias v. Mondo Properties LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Espinosa v. RandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Medina v. Jet Aviation Holdings USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. Medina v. Jet Aviation Holdings USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  5. Velez v. South Nine Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API