Legal Opinion

Smith v. Saul

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1924No. 17312PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondent, by the judgment below, was allowed to recover for funeral expenses paid by him for the burial of his deceased wife; also to recover for personal services and labor upon a tract of orchard land owned and held by himself and his wife as tenants in common, and these amounts were decreed to be a lien upon that part of the land which, by the same decree, was partitioned and set over to the estate of the deceased wife. The. defendant, as executrix of the last will and the estate of the deceased wife, has appealed from that judgment, and assigns as error only the three features contained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. EichnerWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lang's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Leinweber v. LeinweberWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Truax v. EllettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Wittwer v. PembertonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hansen v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API