Legal Opinion

Raynor v. Mutual of Omaha

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1975No. 746SC907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

“A party against whom a claim ... is asserted . . . , may, at any time, move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary judgment in his favor as to all or any part thereof.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56 (b). In the present case the trial court granted summary judgment against that part of plaintiff’s case which sought punitive damages.

The preliminary question arises as to whether this “partial summary judgment” is appealable.

“When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or *574third-party claim, or when multiple parties…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arnold v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Beck v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API