Legal Opinion

Wright v. Mayberry

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 26, 1988No. 1 CA-CIV 9462PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge.

We consider whether the trial court erred in finding that the jury intended a partially contingent verdict and in reducing the award of damages by striking the contingent amount.

BACKGROUND

As a result of a car accident involving Danya Wright (Wright) and Bobby Mayberry (Mayberry), Wright suffered cartilage and ligament damage in her knee. She sued Mayberry alleging that Mayberry was negligent. In defending, Mayberry contended that Wright was contributorily negligent.

Wright’s physician, Dr. David Rand, testified that he had performed arthroscopic surgery to repair…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Isidore Strauss v. Stratojac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Barrow v. TalbottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Berry v. McLeodArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Association Research and Development Corporation v. CNA Financial Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lund v. McEnerneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. Gonzales v. Arizona Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API