Legal Opinion

Long Island Rail Road v. United Transportation Union

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sidney Leviss, J.

In this action to restrain defendants from striking or conducting other job actions allegedly in violation of the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, art 14), defendants move to change venue from New York County to this county. Defendants’ claim is based not only upon a contention of improper venue but also upon a claim that the change is necessary for the convenience of witnesses.

The action was commenced by the service of a summons and complaint on or about February 13, 1980. Thereafter the action was removed to the Federal District Court for the Southern…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plumbing, Heating, Piping & Air Conditioning Contractors Ass'n v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Callanan Industries, Inc. v. Sovereign Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. General Precision, Inc. v. Ametek, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. De Litta v. MildeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Transportation Union v. Long Island Rail Road & Metropolitan Transportation Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  2. Engebrethson v. EngebrethsonNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  3. United Transp. Union v. LONG ISLAND RR, ETC.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API