Legal Opinion

James v. Mississippi Bar

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2007No. 2005-BA-01622-SCTPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

962 So.2d 528 (2007)

Ceola JAMES

v.

The MISSISSIPPI BAR.

No. 2005-BA-01622-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

January 18, 2007.

Ceola James, pro se.

James Russell Clark, Adam Bradley Kilgore, Gwen Combs, Jackson, attorneys for appellee.

EN BANC.

DIAZ, Justice, for the Court.

¶ 1. In this attorney discipline case we are asked whether a former judge may represent a party in a case related to one over which she formerly presided. Because the Rules of Professional Conduct squarely prohibit such a situation, we hold that she may not.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Unusually, the factual situation underlying…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mississippi Bar v. DrungoleMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Parrish v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mississippi Bar v. InserraMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Goeldner v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  5. J.N.W.E. v. W.D.W.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mississippi Bar v. AbiotoMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Mississippi Bar v. DolanMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  4. Miller v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In re HoltMississippi Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API