United States v. Menendez
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, Senior District Judge
Before the Court are five motions by Defendants Robert Menendez and Salo-mon Melgen to dismiss the indictment in this criminal action. Defendants challenge Counts One through Twenty-One of the indictment for failure to allege an “official act” within the meaning of the bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 201. Motion to-Dismiss 10, ECF No. 57. They also move to dismiss each Count in the indictment for lack of specificity under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Motion to Dismiss 7, ECF No. 54. In their eleventh motion to dismiss, Defendants challenge the conspir*713acy…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JENKINS v. GIRL'S HOPE OF PITTSBURGH, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Miserendino v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- United States v. WatkinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022