21st Century Insurance v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In 2000, in response to charges of rampant mishandling of insurance claims arising out of the Northridge earthquake of 1994, the Legislature enacted Code of Civil Procedure section 340.9 (section 340.9), which revived certain previously time-barred insurance claims. In 20th Century Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 1247 [109 Cal.Rptr.2d 611], we concluded the statute revived not only contract claims, but also tort claims for bad faith. We also concluded the revival statute did not destroy vested rights in violation of the due process clause.
Plaintiffs and real…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berger v. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- California v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.District Court, S.D. California · 2008
- Hipsher v. L. A. Cnty. Emps. Ret. Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hipsher v. Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Hipsher v. Los Angeles County Employees Retirement etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.