Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Henderson
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 7, 1998No. Civil Action 97-2151-GLRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
The court has under consideration Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 26) and a Motion For Leave to File Separately Attachments to Declarations of Mark Scarborough and John Ford Submitted with Memorandum in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 28). Plaintiff opposes the motion for summary judgment. He has filed no response to the motion for leave. Accordingly, the court grants the latter motion as uncontested. See D.Kan. Rule 7.4. The court will consider the documents attached to the motion for leave as…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bergman v. PaulsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Tesh v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002
- Pinegar v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- (PC) Scott v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Arellano v. SantosDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.