Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ramon Ramirez-Alejandre v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 2003No. 00-70724Published

1DissentTrott, Circuit Judge

with whom O’SCANNLAIN, GOULD, TALLMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, join.

“A motion to reopen is one of two ways, a motion to reopen, or just send it in. It violates due process to ignore what we sent in.”

Counsel for petitioner (explaining during oral argument the nature of his claim).

I

Ramirez-Alejandre claims that the BIA’s decision not to consider new factual information “just sent in” for the first time on appeal regarding the merits of his request for suspension of deportation constituted a denial of due process of law. There are four main reasons why his claim fails.

First, the method he…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-PinedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API