Legal Opinion

Chambers v. City of Fordyce, Arkansas

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 29, 2007No. 04-3649PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Charles and Ola Chambers, the parents of Sidney Chambers and the co-administrators of his estate, appeal the district court’s 1 denial of their Motion to Reopen Case and/or Relief for [sic] Judgment related to the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims they brought against the appellees based on excessive force in the shooting death of their son. We affirm the district court’s Order denying the Motion to Reopen, and we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction to the extent it raises issues related to the summary judgment granted to the City of Fordyce and to Chief of Police Joe Pennington.

Fordyce City…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. DardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries and Ingersoll-Rand CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Raeburn Bedford v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Auto Services Co., Inc. v. KPMG, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Braitberg v. Charter Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. Prince v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Brian Jeffries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API