Kekoa Ex Rel. Enomoto v. Supreme Court
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurrence
LANHAM, CIRCUIT JUDGE,
CONCURRING
I agree with the statement of facts and the summary of the prior court actions taken in this case, as set forth in the majority opinion.1 I also concur in the majority opinion, except that, in my opinion, it failed to dispose of one of the important issues on this case. That issue is slightly touched upon in the portion of the majority opinion which reads as follows:
*117“ . . . Trustee action may be challenged in the usual and proper manner in the circuit courts under the strict fiduciary and other standards applicable to all trustees. All we decide here is that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re John's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Glader v. SchwingeIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Leman v. ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Raffety v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- King v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.