Saulsberry v. Saulsberry, Et Ux.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.
In this case the principal question is whether the averments of the second amended bill of complaint are sufficient to raise a constructive trust.
Briefly stated, the facts alleged are: Mose Saulsberry made a will in 1939. Complainants were devised certain lands under the will, and, with another not joining in this suit, were residuary legatees under the will. On October 18,1952, Mose Saulsberry conveyed to Johnie Saulsberry and his wife, Lizzie, 170 acres of land for a recited consideration of $3,150, and other good and valuable considerations, receipt of which was acknowledged. Mose’s wife,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Ham v. HamMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
- Anding v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
- Bourn v. BournMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
- Woodville v. PizzatiMississippi Supreme Court · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- McNeil v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Allgood v. AllgoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Sojourner v. SojournerMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Union National Life Ins. Co. v. CrosbyMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Joel v. JoelMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.