Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Wientjes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 1985No. 83-1360PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Plaintiff in a civil damage suit. We address each of three alleged evidentiary errors separately and set out the necessary facts in our discussion of each issue.

I. Introduction of Evidence after the Completion of Closing Arguments

Appellant's/Defendant's first argument is that the trial court erred in allowing Plaintiff to introduce evidence after the evidence portion of the trial was closed. Defendant objected to Plaintiff's reference to a mortality table in his argument because, according to Defendant, the table had not been timely introduced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CRAWFORD COAL CO., INC. v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Byars v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. MacOn County Com'n v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Clements v. Dr. John Alvan Stewart, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Knapp v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Greener v. KilloughCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Akins Funeral Home, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API