Legal Opinion
Schocket v. Classic Auto Sales, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1991No. 90CA0254PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PIERCE.
Plaintiff, Alan L. Schocket, appeals a judgment dismissing his complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants, Classic Auto Sales, Inc. (Classic) and Terry Kuehl. We reverse and remand for reinstatement of plaintiffs complaint.
In the fall of 1988 plaintiff, a resident of Colorado, purchased two nationally-circulated magazines in which defendants had advertised for sale a 1968 Porsche 911S Targa automobile. In response to the advertisements, plaintiff made a telephone call to Classic in Omaha, Nebraska, at which time Kuehl confirmed the information presented…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Classic Auto Sales, Inc. v. SchocketSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- GCI 1985-1 LTD. v. Murray Properties PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Shepard's McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. Legalsoft Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Schocket v. Classic Auto Sales, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991