Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Bauer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1905No. Nos. 14,218—(195)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hubbard county, McClenahan, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Action in claim and delivery for the recovery of ninety five thousand feet of logs cut and skidded by defendant on the land of plaintiff in Hubbard county. The cause was tried to the court, who made findings of fact, holding that the plaintiff was the owner of the logs in question, and entitled to the possession thereof. Judgment was ordered accordingly.

Under the terms of the contract established in this case, one Koop acquired the right from the legal owners of the land described in the complaint to cut and remove the timber therefrom until June 1, 1902, which right was transferred March 8,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. MerrimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Boisaubin v. ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Steller v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Mahan v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. State v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Indiana & Arkansas Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Knight v. KnightWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API