Legal Opinion

Fabric Fire Hose Co. v. Town of Whitestown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Town of Whitestown, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Oneida on the 8th day of December, 1917, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the Oneida Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

De Angelis, J.:

The action was brought for the price of fire hose, nozzles, etc., sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant, as alleged in the complaint, upon a proposal and acceptance, copies of which, attached thereto, are as follows:

“ New York, November 12,1908.
“ To the Town of Whitestown, N. Y.
“ The Fabric Fire Hose Company hereby agrees to furnish: 1,000 feet, more or less, Keystone Brand Wax and Gum Treated Fire Hose, at $1.00 per ft. * * * with Automatic *119Couplings attached, thread of couplings to fit those now in use in your department. [Certain guaranties in no way involved…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Whitestown v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People Ex Rel. Farley v. . WinklerNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Town of Whitestown v. . the Title Guaranty and Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Town of Whitestown v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Town of IrondequoitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Hellawell v. GrafeldDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API