Legal Opinion

State v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 22, 2019No. 2 CA-CR 2018-0136Published

1Opinion of the Court

BREARCLIFFE, Judge:

¶1 Aaron Michael Rose appeals his convictions after a jury trial on two counts of sexual conduct with a minor under the age of fifteen. We affirm.

Issues

¶2 Rose contends the trial court committed fundamental error by admitting, under Rule 404(c), Ariz. R. Evid., evidence of his juvenile delinquency adjudication for child molestation. The state contends that the evidence was properly admitted. The sole issue on appeal is whether the court erred because Rule 404(c) does not permit the admission of evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts committed by a juvenile as evidence of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API