Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chavarria v. Stacks

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 20, 2004No. 03-40977Published

1DissentKing, Chief Judge

Even though this court has recognized that sleep is a basic human need, the denial of which can violate the Eighth Amendment, this court today decides that a prisoner’s allegation that he is being deprived of sleep is frivolous—i.e., based on an “indisputably meritless legal theory.” Berry v. Brady, 192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir.1999) (emphasis added) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). I would hold that the magistrate judge abused his discretion in dismissing Chavarria’s claim as frivolous, vacate the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim, and remand for further…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API