Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Baker

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 2006No. CIV.A. 03-952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBRENO, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendants Mary Lou Baker 1 and Mark Alieva’s 2 (“defendants”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion will be granted.

1. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Allegations

A brief recitation of the facts follows. A more detailed description can be found in the Court’s prior opinion, McKnight v. Baker, 343 F.Supp.2d 422 (E.D.Pa.2004).

This case arises out of a dispute between plaintiff and Dawn Middleton (“Middleton”) concerning custody and visitation rights of their daughter, Elana. The dispute has been in litigation in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BURFORD v. DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Jamal Bennett v. Thomas HeapDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  3. Josiah Lee Gottschall v. Eric Lindhardt, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  4. Lewis v. KeuerleberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API