McKnight v. Baker
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBRENO, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants Mary Lou Baker 1 and Mark Alieva’s 2 (“defendants”) motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion will be granted.
1. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Allegations
A brief recitation of the facts follows. A more detailed description can be found in the Court’s prior opinion, McKnight v. Baker, 343 F.Supp.2d 422 (E.D.Pa.2004).
This case arises out of a dispute between plaintiff and Dawn Middleton (“Middleton”) concerning custody and visitation rights of their daughter, Elana. The dispute has been in litigation in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BURFORD v. DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Jamal Bennett v. Thomas HeapDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Josiah Lee Gottschall v. Eric Lindhardt, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Lewis v. KeuerleberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025