Legal Opinion

Barron v. Myers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1906No. Docket No. 54PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Macomb; Tappan, J., presiding. Bill by Theodore Barron against Addie E. Myers and Merlin A. Myers to set aside a deed. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHookeb, J.

We are asked to reverse the decree for the complainant in this cause, upon four grounds:(1) Upon the merits, it being contended that fraud has not been shown.(2) Upon the ground of complainant’s delay, or laches, in asserting a right to rescind the contract.(3) Upon the ground that defendant Addie E. Myers was a bona fide purchaser of the premises for value.(4) That the defendants cannot be placed in status quo.

Merlin A. Myers and the complainant had dealings, whereby the former agreed to sell to the latter certain mining stock and bonds, and to take in part payment therefor, a business block…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graham v. MoffettMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Webber v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Witte v. HobolthMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hansen v. HolmbergOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. John Schweyer & Co. v. MellonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API