Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Stanley

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided August 25, 2003No. 8:03-cv-01154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MERRYDAY, District Judge.

The defendants counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that certain Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) policies provide coverage for the defendants’ claims of emotional distress in underlying state court actions by the defendants against several of Allstate’s insureds (Doc. 3). Allstate moves to dismiss the counterclaim and argues that section 627.4136(1), Florida Statutes, bars the counterclaim (Doc. II). 1 The defendants oppose the motion and argue that section 627.4136(1) is procedural and thus inapplicable in a federal action founded on diversity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. VanBibber v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Gregg v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1984
  3. Hett v. Madison Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Tomlinson v. State FarmDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blitz Telecom Consulting, LLC v. Peerless Network, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
  2. Cruickshank v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. (In Re Dolphinite, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  3. Blau v. BILL HEARD CHEVROLET CORPORATION-ORLANDODistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2009
  4. Polensky v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API