Legal Opinion
Cromeens v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided September 18, 2025No. 8:23-cv-00234Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA GAYLON CROMEENS, Plaintiff, 8:23CV234 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., Defendant. Before the Court is Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Filing No. 54. Gaylon Cromeens worked for Union Pacific as a locomotive engineer. Cromeens had poor vision in his left eye from the day he joined the company and did not meet the eyesight requirements promulgated by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Nevertheless, Union Pacific concluded Cromeens could safely operate a locomotive, and he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.