Legal Opinion

Morris v. Suerken

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion by plaintiffs for judgment on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the CourtGoff, J.

The complaint sets forth a lease by the plaintiffs to defendant’s assignor of certain premises for fifteen years from May 1,1899, to May 1,1914, and the assignment of the lease to the defendant, subject to its terms. The particular term at issue is: The tenants ‘ ‘ agree that they will pay all taxes and assessments which shall be levied or imposed upon said premises during the demised term when such taxes or assessments shall become due.” The plaintiffs claim that the defendant failed, on request, to pay the first half of the taxes for the year 1914, and that he is liable therefor. The answer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rundell v. . LakeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. People ex rel. Depew & Southwestern Railroad v. Board of Railroad CommissionersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Buchanan v. . WhitmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Ogden v. GettyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. Ayer v. BonwitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ward v. . Union Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Elliot v. PolnyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986
  3. Wellhouse v. Central Leases Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API