Legal Opinion

State v. Sprosty

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 6, 1998No. 97-3524PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P. J.

Larry J. Sprosty appeals from an order denying his supervised release under Chapter 980, STATS. Sprosty argues that the committing court erred when it ordered his continued confinement after it had approved his supervised release. We conclude that § 980.08(5), STATS., requires"that a person be released if the trial court determines that supervised release is appropriate, regardless of whether the Department of Health and Family Services (DHFS) locates an appropriate treatment facility willing to accept the person. We therefore reverse and remand with directions.

Background

In 1995, Larry J.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. KedingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. Racine Education Ass'n v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SprostyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. State v. SprostyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API