Kosowsky v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
This is a suit against the surety on the official bond of Frank Cleveland, sheriff of Dickinson county, in 1926, to recover damages for assault and battery and false imprisonment. The condition of the bond omitted some statutory language, but contained the essential requirement that the sheriff should “well and faithfully perform all and singular the duties incumbent upon him * * * as said sheriff.” While the terms of the official bond are prescribed by 1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 2442, tbe statute is -directory, and substantial compliance therewith binds the surety. The bond was the statutory one.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clancy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Lee v. CharmleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- American Guaranty Co. v. McNieceOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- People ex rel. Norris v. MersereauMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. MankinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jemison v. CrichlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Stark Hickey, Inc. v. Standard Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- State ex rel. Hill v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- American Surety Co. v. Van GilderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.