Legal Opinion
Murray v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 4, 2017No. Case No. 1:15-cv-02120-MAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Malcolm F. Marsh, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Denis Murray seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-403. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For the reasons that follow, I reverse the Commissioner’s decision and remand for an immediate award of benefits.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case has a lengthy procedural background. On September 15,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Caldwell v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Cavender v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Crain v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Gott v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Milligan v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.