Legal Opinion

Matter of Tavel

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 2, 1995No. 225, 1995PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

On November 1, 1994, Barbara Tavel-Lip-nick (“Mrs. Tavel-Lipnick” or “daughter”), guardian of the person for her mother, Charlotte Tavel (“Mrs. Tavel” or “mother”), filed a petition in the Court of Chancery. The petition requested authorization to remove a feeding tube from her mother so that her mother would be allowed to die. The Court of Chancery appointed an attorney ad litem to represent Mrs. Tavel’s interests independently. The State of Delaware (“State”), through the Attorney General, was directed to Show Cause why Mrs. Tavel-Lipnick’s petition should not be granted.

On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cerberus International, Ltd. v. Apollo Management L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. Hudak v. ProcekSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  3. Gannett Co., Inc. v. KanagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  4. Helman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. v. JCC Holding Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API