Legal Opinion

People v. Burns

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 3, 1983No. 82-321PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

The defendant, William Burns, was found guilty of three counts of felony deceptive practices following a trial by jury in absentia. He was sentenced to a term of 30 months in the Department of Corrections and ordered to make restitution and pay a fine. On appeal he raises three issues: (1) whether the statute that allows a defendant absent at the start of his trial to be tried in absentia (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 115 — 4.1(a)) is unconstitutional; (2) whether he should be granted a new trial because the trial court did not, as required by statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. People v. PickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. The PEOPLE v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. The People v. De SimoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. The PEOPLE v. SteenbergenIllinois Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. GarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. VelascoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. LesterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API