People v. Burns
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones
The defendant, William Burns, was found guilty of three counts of felony deceptive practices following a trial by jury in absentia. He was sentenced to a term of 30 months in the Department of Corrections and ordered to make restitution and pay a fine. On appeal he raises three issues: (1) whether the statute that allows a defendant absent at the start of his trial to be tried in absentia (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 115 — 4.1(a)) is unconstitutional; (2) whether he should be granted a new trial because the trial court did not, as required by statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- People v. PickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- The PEOPLE v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- The People v. De SimoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- The PEOPLE v. SteenbergenIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. GarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- People v. VelascoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. LesterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.