Legal Opinion

Cleveland Printing Ink Co. v. Phipps

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1928No. 8541PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, PJ.

The plaintiff rests his contention for a salary upon the action of the Board of Directors. The plaintiff was a director and also one Baumgardner, and at the meeting of the Board of Directors where it is claimed the salary was fixed by the Board, the salary of Baumgardner was fixed at the same time. There were seven directors and it took four for a quorum. It appears from the record that Baumgardner and the plaintiff were both present at these meetings where it is claimed the salaries were fixed and attempted to exercise their prerogative as directors upon the question of their…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State, Ex Rel. Squire v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API