Walters v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
*782OPINION
Opinion by
Justice ROSS.
John Arlin Walters was convicted by a jury for murder. The jury assessed punishment at thirty-two years’ imprisonment, and he was sentenced accordingly. Walters appeals, contending the trial court erred by: 1) refusing to allow him to introduce evidence contradicting the State’s evidence; 2) improperly instructing the jury at the guilt/innocence phase; 3) failing to grant a mistrial at the punishment phase when the State commented on Walters’ failure to testify; and 4) admitting evidence of expert opinions.
I. BACKGROUND
Walters shot and killed his older brother,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Potier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Lowe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Walters v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- John Arlin Walters v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.