Chelsea Theater Corp. v. City of Burlington
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Justice.
The question here is whether a local governmental unit has power to legislate against obscene material in Iowa. At issue is an ordinance of the City of Burlington which purports to regulate obscene materials in that community. The trial court held that § 725.9, The Code, deprives the City of authority to enact an ordinance regulating the availability of obscene materials. We affirm.
In Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973), the United States Supreme Court enunciated federal constitutional standards governing state obscenity legislation. When…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. WedelstedtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Iowa National Industrial Loan Co. v. Iowa State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Lenertz v. Municipal Court of City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
3Cited by25 opinions
- Goodell v. Humboldt CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Iowa Bankers Ass'n v. Iowa Credit Union DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- City of Davenport v. SeymourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Mall Real Estate, L.L.C., an Iowa Limited Liability Company v. City of Hamburg, an Iowa Municipal CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.