Weemes v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
James Weemes appeals his convictions of burglary, a class A felony,1 and two counts of criminal recklessness, a class D felony.2 He presents three issues for this court’s review:
I.Whether Weemes was entitled to a mistrial due to inappropriate judicial communication to the jury.
II.Whether Weemes’ burglary conviction is supported by sufficient evidence having probative value.
III.Whether Weemes was entitled to merger of his convictions of burglary and criminal recklessness (Count I).
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
At approximately 1:00 a.m. on February 17, 1993,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Schlomer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Buie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Derado v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Payne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Payne v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Weemes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994