Legal Opinion
Smith v. Seidner
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1997No. 1996-2710PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 172.] SMITH, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Smith v. Seidner,
1997-Ohio-224.] Habeas corpus not available to challenge either the validity or sufficiency of an indictment—Habeas corpus not available to raise claims of improper jury instructions or verdict forms. (No. 96-2710—Submitted March 4, 1997—Decided April 16, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, No. 96CA006407. __________________ {¶ 1} In 1991, a grand jury indicted appellant, Stanley Smith, of one count of felonious…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Simpson v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Smith v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- McKinney v. TibbalsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Moore v. Ohio Apa., Unpublished Decision (4-10-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003