Legal Opinion

Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg College

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1992No. Civ. A. 1:CV-90-1515PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

We currently have before us the motion of defendant, Gettysburg College, to reconsider our order, dated November 1, 1991, which denied its motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Oral argument on the reconsideration motion was held on January 30, 1992, and the parties subsequently submitted additional legal authorities. We will evaluate the current motion under the same standard to be employed in deciding a motion for summary judgment. The latter standard was recently set forth in Gray v. York Newspapers, Inc., 957 F.2d 1070 (3d Cir.1992).…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Gray v. York Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Leong Ex Rel. Petagno v. TakasakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Mazzagatti v. Everingham by EveringhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API