Legal Opinion

People v. Suarez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1982PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*942OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that his rights under CPL 30.30 were violated was forfeited when he entered his plea of guilty (People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845). In addition, and for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, we find there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial (see People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442).

Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum; Chief Judge Cooke and Judge Jones taking no part.

Order affirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. FrisciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. PaduanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. GoodenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. PersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API