Trusty v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
*734KAUGER, J.,
concurring in paiVdissenting in part, with whom WINCHESTER, EDMONDSON, . TAAYLOR, JJ., join:
¶ 1 We retained this cause to address whether the State must prove compliance with regulatory requirements for the collection of blood for a blood alcohol content test to, be used against a driver in a driver’s license revocation proceeding. I agree that DPS bears the burden of showing compliance with regulatory requirements for drawing blood in order to use the test results against a driver. Nevertheless, pursuant to 47 O.S. 2011 § 757: “the provisions of sections 751 through 761 of this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Darnell v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.