Smith v. Czescel
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue of this appeal is whether the trial court committed plain error in its charge to the jury regarding falling asleep while operating a motor vehicle. We conclude that the charge as given does fall within the plain error doctrine.
The named plaintiff, Leonard Smith, and his minor daughter, Kristen Smith (the plaintiff), appeal from the judgment rendered upon a verdict for the defendant, who was the owner and operator of a motor vehicle in which the plaintiff was a passenger. The plaintiffs’ principal claims of error concern the court’s instructions to the jury arising out of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Potz v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Carlson v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. FalconConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Barca v. BarcaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. LucaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Daley v. GaitorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. RamirezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.