Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Drexler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 1960No. 38355PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

Code § 14-301 provides: “Every ne gotiable instrument is deemed prima facie to- have been issued for a valuable consideration, and every person whose signature appears thereon to have become a party thereto for value.” The first special ground of the motion for a new trial raises the question of whether the presumption of consideration continues in the presence of adverse testimony so that, even without additional testimony for the plaintiff, a jury question remains in the case. Code § 38-113 states: “Presumptions are either of law or of fact. The former are conclusions and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Myers v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Cooper v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Swift & Company v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Pike v. GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API