Goldstein v. Drexler
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Judge.
Code § 14-301 provides: “Every ne gotiable instrument is deemed prima facie to- have been issued for a valuable consideration, and every person whose signature appears thereon to have become a party thereto for value.” The first special ground of the motion for a new trial raises the question of whether the presumption of consideration continues in the presence of adverse testimony so that, even without additional testimony for the plaintiff, a jury question remains in the case. Code § 38-113 states: “Presumptions are either of law or of fact. The former are conclusions and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Myers v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Cooper v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Swift & Company v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Pike v. GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961