Christoffel v. E. F. Hutton & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Christoffel, the current guardian of the estate of Styer, an incompetent, brought this action against E. F. Hutton & Company, Inc. (“Hutton”) seeking to hold Hutton vicariously liable for losses sustained by the incompetent’s estate due to Hutton’s former employee, Schwager, who both dissipated and misappropriated assets of the estate during his tenure as guardian. Federal jurisdiction was based on Christoffel’s claim that Hutton was a “controlling person,” within the meaning of section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78t) and thus liable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Rochez Brothers, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Charles R. RhoadesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Kamen & Co. v. Paul H. Aschkar & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Gordon v. BurrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Garrett v. Reid-Cashion Land & Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Metge v. BaehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Harrison v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Metge v. BaehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- McFarland v. Memorex Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.