Legal Opinion

State v. Lacey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 2016No. 11CR0121, 12CR0202; A156849 (Control), A156850PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Defendant, who elected to represent himself at his criminal trial, behaved abysmally throughout the course of that trial. The trial court afforded defendant great patience but, shortly before closing argument, after repeatedly informing defendant that his behavior risked his removal from court and the trial proceeding in his absence, the court found defendant in contempt, declared defendant to have forfeited his right to present closing argument and otherwise participate in the proceedings, and ordered defendant removed from the courtroom. The trial continued in defendant’s absence and,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Leroy Roosevelt MackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Davis v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. MenefeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TejadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. State v. LaceyOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. TejadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Shriners Hospitals for Children v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API