Legal Opinion

Acon-Chen v. Buttigieg

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 5, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2024-1529Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FELIX ACON-CHEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-1529 (RDM) PETE BUTTIGIEG, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Felix Acon-Chen, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Pete Buttigieg, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation, Merrick Garland, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, and Matthew Graves, in his official capacity as United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. Dkt. 1 at 1–2. Defendants move to dismiss Acon-Chen’s complaint pursuant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Brown v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
  3. Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
  4. Jiggetts v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API