Legal Opinion
Julie Maynard, Inc. v. Whatever It Takes Transmissions and Parts, Inc
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 5, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00238Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Julie Maynard, Inc., doing business as Consolidated Vehicle Converters, Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, Case No. 3:19-cv-238 v. Judge Thomas M. Rose Whatever It Takes Transmissions and Parts, Inc., et al., Defendants/Counter-claimants. DECISION AND ENTRY GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. 50, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. DOC. 53, 73. PLAINTIFF IS AWARDED SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITS CLAIM FOR FAILING TO PAY MONEY…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Hancock v. DodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.