Legal Opinion
Harris v. Pernsley
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 31, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 82-1847PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHAPIRO, District Judge.
In this civil rights action concerning conditions of confinement in City of Philadelphia penal institutions, the District Attorney for Philadelphia, Ronald D. Castille, has moved to intervene as a party-defendant. The motion is opposed by the plaintiff-prisoner class and by “the City defendants.” 1 Defendants Waldman, Marks, and Jeffes have neither opposed nor supported Mr. Castille’s motion. An evidentiary hearing and argument were held on October 10, 1986, October 27, 1986, and November 14, 1986.2 On December 11, 1986, the court stated from the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harris v. PernsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Harris v. ReevesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Harris v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Harris v. PernsleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Borkowski v. Fraternal Order of Police, Philadelphia Lodge No. 5District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.