Legal Opinion
Roe v. Town of Highland
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 14, 1990No. 89-1792PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal of the judgment of the district court denying a motion by a member of a putative class to intervene in the action to represent the class on appeal. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
FACTS
On April 17,1987, the original plaintiff in this suit filed a civil rights action challenging the Town of Highland’s policy of strip searching women detained for any offense, including traffic offenses. Jane Roe (a pseudonym) was the named plaintiff for a putative class of women who had been strip searched in Highland. On September…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- George E. Apostol v. Mark Gallion, John Auriemma v. Fred Rice, and City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Marcial v. Coronet Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Secretary of Labor v. FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Joseph C. Valentino v. Michael J. Howlett, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Company Doe v. Public CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Arreola v. GodinezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Taylor v. KeyCorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Flying J, Inc. v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.