Otten v. Otten
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Respondent brought this action for separate maintenance and support and for an equitable division of marital property. After a hearing, the family court judge signed an order proposed by respondent’s counsel. Appellant moved pursuant to Rules 59(e) and 60(a), SCRCP, to modify the order. Because of appellant’s uncertainty as to the effect the motions would have on the time for appeal, he served and filed a notice of appeal.
Appellant now moves this Court to remand the matter for consideration of his motions. The motion to remand is granted and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice.
We…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Coward Hund Construction Co. v. Ball Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Canal Insurance v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Murray Properties Partnership v. L. P. Cox Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Wicker v. Anderson County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.